Thursday, October 15, 2020

Something to Think About

 Something To Think About.

October 14, 2020

(Not sure how much I will write and blog but I just feel strongly to write and blog on things.  This blog is about my thoughts on what is in the news.  Writing has never been a strength of mine so I would welcome an editor to help me strengthen my writings.)

Sometimes you find a joke that is so true that it fits into ones view of life.  I found this joke to best represent my views on politics: “How many politicians does it take to change a light bulb? Two: one to change it and another one to change it back again.” (J. Carroll 2019)  My feelings is this has happened because both sides feel that they alone are right and the other side is completely wrong.  I have even found that some even think that the other side are anti-American. Just having said that some will have already sounded a defense to that statement instead of taking a moment to pounder that thought.  If you think that I alone have to right ideas and no one can disagree with me, is  un-American.  Freedom is to be able to think, feel, and express once view even if the hearer might disagree with them.  I will come back to this in more detail in a future blog.

Amy Coney Barrett has been recently nominated to the Supreme Court by President Trump.  It is also an election year which makes it somewhat the same as when President Obama nominated Merrick Garland to the court.  Merrick was nominated on March 16, 2016 where as Barret was nominated on September 26, 2020.  Note, both nominees were picked during and election year.  Now remember the joke at the beginning and remember election year.  It is also worth pointing out that in both cases the republican party  have control of the senate.  Sense Obama was a democrat and republicans are control of the senate most republican senators said let the voters to decide if we move forward with the Merrick nomination, by who they vote for in the fall presidential election.  Lets flash forward to today and republicans are moving forward with the Barrett nomination before a presidential election.  They don’t want to wait until after the election and see who wins.  It boils down to they want Barrett because she comes from a republican president.

Democrats wanted the nomination of Merrick to go through back in 2016 republicans did not.  Now Democrats don’t want the nomination of Barrett to go through but republicans do.  Catch this and listen closely both sides are being Hippocrates. Both sides have wanted that light bulb changed and not changed at different points.  If republican’s were really believing in 2016 that the people should decide if the nomination should go through by who they vote for president they would have done that with the Barrett nomination. They do not want to risk  not getting who they want on the court. Democrats would not being saying that they should wait when they did not  want to wait with the Merrick nomination. They are saying what the republicans were saying in 2016. Light bulb joke again.

Justice should be at the heart of a Supreme court nomination but it hasn’t truly been that way in a long time.  Both parties appoint activist judges because they want the court to vote approval and disapproval of what laws and matters that come before the court their way.  I must ask what happened to Justice being blind?  Interpretation and ways of interpretation of the constitution are and always will be a factor that Justices have to deal with.  Yet, I find that only a small part of what the parties are looking for in a Judge on the court.  Take abortion for instants, republicans they want a pro-life judge because they believe they are protecting life and democrats want a judge that backs choice.  This issue comes up with all nominees and I want to point out that not much has changed when in comes to abortion rights and yet it has always been an issue.  If justice is blind and the constitution is the law of the land why wait for a court to reverse the decision on Row verse Wade.  They could try to get an amendment to the constitution that would outlaw abortion.  Roe verses Wade was decided in 1973 and here it is 2020 and soon it will be 50 years sense that discussion.  I point this out because I am tired of the republicans holding my prolife point of view hostage just to get a vote.

I just picked abortion as one issue but we could talk about other things like healthcare and with the election coming up, there could be issues where the court needs to rule.  That is why justice should not be decide by politics but by Justices that seek answers through the constitution and not how they feel.

Now back to the light bulb, the only way to change direction is for people to learn to work together.  NO ONE PARTY IS ABSOLUTLY RIGHT!  We need each other and need to come together and work together and our voted in representatives need to listen to both sides to make sure they do what is right for the country.  Even if that means losing votes.  Both parties LOVE AMERICA and they want WHAT IS BEST for the country.  If the light bulb needs changed it should be changed and we need to move forward not put back in the same burned out bulb we had before. 

References

J. Carroll. 2019. "Editor." In Dad Jokes It's a Punderful Life, 6. San Diego: Portable Press.